Favorable Weather Boosts Numbers, But Herbicides Still Threaten Butterfly’s Future
WASHINGTON—At 150 million butterflies, the annual overwintering count of monarch butterflies released today shows an encouraging population rebound from last year’s second lowest-ever count of 42 million butterflies, but is still one of the lowest populations since surveys began in 1993. The population was expected to be up this winter due to favorable summer weather conditions in the monarch’s U.S. breeding areas, as butterfly populations fluctuate widely with changing weather. The estimated 150 million monarchs currently gathered in Mexico for the winter represents a population decline of 32 percent from the 22-year average — and a decline of 78 percent from the population highs in the mid-1990s. This year’s population was expected to be two to five times larger than last year’s due to the favorable weather during the late summer breeding season.
“Monarch populations are still severely jeopardized by milkweed loss in their summer breeding grounds due to increasing herbicide use on genetically engineered crops,” said George Kimbrell, a senior attorney at Center for Food Safety. “Only Endangered Species Act protection will provide the scientific and legal blueprint that is needed to ensure the butterfly’s future.”
“The increase is certainly great news, but the bottom line is that monarchs must reach a much larger population size to be resilient to ever-increasing threats,” said Tierra Curry, a senior scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity. “So this much-loved butterfly still needs Endangered Species Act protection to make sure its amazing migration will endure for generations to come.”
Found throughout the United States and southern Canada during summer months, most monarchs from east of the Rockies winter in the mountains of central Mexico, where they form tight clusters on trees. Scientists from World Wildlife Fund Mexico estimate the population size by counting the number of hectares of trees covered by monarchs.
Monarchs need a very large population size to be resilient to threats from severe weather events, pesticides and climate change. A single winter storm in 2002 killed an estimated 500 million of the butterflies, more than three times the size of the current population even with this year’s boost. Severe weather is expected to take a toll on the population later this winter due to the strong El Niño this year.
In addition to threats from climate change and logging in their Mexican habitat, the monarch butterfly’s dramatic decline has been driven in large part by the widespread planting of genetically engineered crops in the Midwest, where most monarchs are born. The vast majority of genetically engineered crop acreage is planted in varieties made to be resistant to Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, a potent killer of milkweed, the monarch caterpillar’s only food. The dramatic surge in the use of Roundup and other herbicides with the same active ingredient (glyphosate) with Roundup Ready crops has virtually wiped out milkweed plants in Midwest corn and soybean fields. In the past 20 years it is estimated that these once-common, iconic orange-and-black butterflies may have lost more than 165 million acres of habitat — an area about the size of Texas — including nearly a third of their summer breeding grounds.
Last year the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced that it will provide a total of $3.2 million to support monarch conservation, but that total is only enough to restore 1 percent of the habitat that has been lost, and will not address the most critical habitat: milkweed in agricultural areas. There is too little potential habitat outside of cropland to support a viable monarch population. Corn and soybeans dominate the Midwest landscape — the heart of monarch breeding range — leaving little area in roadsides, pastures and other land where milkweed can grow.
“Without addressing the eradication of milkweed within agricultural fields, monarch populations will not rebound to resilient, healthy levels,” said Kimbrell.
Logging on the monarch’s Mexican wintering grounds also threatens the butterfly’s survival. Although in recent years Mexican authorities had made great progress in reducing illegal logging, in August they reported that 49 acres of key habitat had been illegally logged in San Felipe de los Alzati, and in December 2015 it was reported that an additional 25 acres of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve in Sierra Chincua had been illegally cut.
Concerns over the threats facing the monarch led the Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety and allies to petition the Fish and Wildlife Service in August 2014 to protect the butterfly as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. In December 2014 the Service announced that protection may be warranted for the monarch and commenced an official review of its status. The Centers notified the agency in early January that they intend to file suit if the Service does not set a legally binding date to issue a decision on whether the butterfly will be federally protected. The agency is now late in issuing a legally required “12-month finding” that will determine whether to protect the monarch butterfly under the Act.
More than 40 leading monarch scientists, 50 members of Congress, and more than 200 organizations and businesses submitted letters to the Service in support of protecting the monarch under the Endangered Species Act.
The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 990,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
Center for Food Safety’s mission is to empower people, support farmers, and protect the earth from the harmful impacts of industrial agriculture. Through groundbreaking legal, scientific, and grassroots action, we protect and promote your right to safe food and the environment. Please join our more than 750,000 consumer and farmer advocates across the country at www.centerforfoodsafety.org.
Source: Center For Food Safety